Horatio N. Cary vs. Cleveland and Toledo Railroad Company legal documents
Scope and content
Correspondence and documents in the case as it came before the Oneida County Supreme Court. Correspondents include the plaintiff's attorneys, Kernan & Quin (of Utica, New York), Horatio Cary, and the defendant's attorneys, Tracy, Wait & Olmstead (of New York City). Also included are transcripts of Margaret Bedell's testimony in the case.
Dates
- 1856-1858.
Creator
- Cary, Horatio N. (Plaintiff, Person)
- Cleveland and Toledo Railroad Company, (Defendant, Organization)
- Kernan and Quin (Firm) (Organization)
- Tracy, Wait & Olmstead (Firm) (Organization)
Language of Material
In English.
Biographical / Historical
Margaret M. Bedell, a resident of Rome, New York, brought a trunk with her when she went to visit a relative in Toledo, Ohio in 1855. On her way back from Toledo, bad weather delayed the train to Buffalo for five hours and forced her to stay in a hotel there overnight before traveling further. When she went to the railroad depot the next morning to pick up her trunk and board the next train home, she found that the depot had burned down, and the trunk was nowhere to be found. She asked to be compensated for the value of its contents, but was never paid, so she engaged Horatio Cary to sue the railroad on her behalf.
Extent
.1 cubic feet. (.1 cubic feet.)
- Description rules
- Describing Archives: A Content Standard
- Language of description
- Undetermined
- Script of description
- Code for undetermined script
Repository Details
Part of the Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections Repository
2B Carl A. Kroch Library
Cornell University
Ithaca NY 14853
607-255-3530
607-255-9524 (Fax)